Need to edit video or audio in OS X? Check out this list of 15 of the best audio and video editing apps available in the Mac App Store. It's pretty well known that Linux is a big deal in modern movie making. Linux is the standard base, a literal for digital effects but, like all technology with momentum, it seems that the process of cutting footage still defaults mostly to a non-Linux platform. Slowly, however, as artists seek to simplify and consolidate the post-production pipeline, Linux video editing is gaining in popularity. It can be difficult to talk about video editing objectively because it means so many different things to different people. For instance, to some people a video editing application must be able to generate fancy animated title sequences, while professional users balk at the idea of doing serious work on titles in their video editor. It's not unlike the debate over professional SLR cameras that happened when digital cameras in phones became contenders for serious photography. For this reason, a pragmatic overview of a Linux-based video editor needs two broad qualifiers: How it performs for home users, and how it might integrate into a professional pipeline. Defining key terms • Independent: For the purposes of this article, I'll call a workflow that begins and ends with either one video editing software or one computer system either 'independent' or 'hobbyist.' In other words, an independent or hobbyist filmmaker is likely to use one application to do video editing, maybe a few other applications for specialized tasks like audio sweetening or motion graphics, and then they're done. Their project is exported and delivered. • Professional integration: A 'professional' editor probably also uses only one application to edit video, but that's because they're a cog in a larger machine. A professional editor might get their footage from a producer or director, and when they're done they probably aren't exporting the final version that their audiences are going to see, but they'll pass their work on to audio engineers, VFX artists, and colorists. Top pro pick: Kdenlive is the best-in-class professional open source editing application, hands-down. As long as you run a stable version of Kdenlive on a stable Linux OS, use reasonable file formats, and keep your work organized, you'll have a reliable, professional-quality editing experience. Strengths • The interface is intuitive for anyone who has ever used a professional-style editing application. • The way you work in Kdenlive is natural and flexible, allowing you to use both of the major styles of editing: cutting by numbers and just. • Kdenlive has plenty of capabilities beyond just cutting up footage. It can do some advanced visual effects, like, all manner of composting (see,, and ),,, and much much more. Weaknesses • The greatest weakness of open source editing is also its greatest strengths: Kdenlive lets you throw nearly anything you want at it, even if that sometimes means its performance suffers. You should resist the urge to take advantage of this flexibility and instead manage your assets and formats smartly. Instead of using an MP3, convert the MP3 to WAV first (which is what other editors do for you, but they do it 'behind the scenes'). Don't throw in an animated GIF without first breaking it out into a series of images. Gaining flexibility means you gain the responsibility for maintaining a sensible media library. • The interface, while accounting for both 'traditional' editing styles and the 'modern' style of treating the timeline as a sort of scratchpad, wouldn't really satisfy an editor who wants to cut by numbers. Currently, there's no way, for instance, to modify or move clips with quick number-pad entries (typing +6, for instance, has no effect on a video region's placement in the timeline). Independent • If anything, Kdenlive could be overkill for home users who aren't accustomed to professional-style editing. Basic operations of the interface are mostly intuitive, but new editors might feel that there's a learning curve for advanced operations (like and ). • On the other hand, it scales down well. How to upgrade quickbooks for mac 2014 to 2016. QuickBooks for Mac can upgrade QuickBooks for Windows 2008, 2009, and 2010 (Enterprise edition excluded) company files directly Q: How are payroll transactions converted if I switch from QuickBooks for Windows to Mac? A: QuickBooks for Mac doesn't use the same payroll service as. You can use a fraction of its features and find it a pretty simple, mostly intuitive editor. • And for serious home editors and independent movie makers, Kdenlive is worth and, and it is likely to satisfy all requirements. It may not always be a drop-in replacement if you're transitioning from some other editor, but it's familiar enough to keep the learning curve manageable. Professional integration • If you're working in a production environment with an established workflow, then any change to your editor requires adaptation. • Kdenlive saves projects as an XML file, so it's possible to convert an existing edit decision list (EDL) to a Kdenlive project file, although there aren't any official auto-converters available yet, so round trips (i.e., returning to the original application) out of Kdenlive would require intervention. Alternately, round trips can be done with lossless clip exports, which can be reintegrated into a project after whatever has been applied from the external application. • The same holds true for.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |